Casual Friday: Bread and Circuses
And you know when there's a new huge controversy in SF, and you don't really want to comment because it involves your all-time favourite author, and besides, everyone has already said anything you might say about it, and you'd just be re-hashing their points of view? Yeah, that. Anyway...
Another question in our This Time Next Year Game has been answered, question 12. The June issue of Isaac Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine is out, and despite some good guesses, none of you correctly identified any of the authors featured therein. (I'm amazed that many of you thought that was my cute way of announcing I'd placed another story there!) So the leaderboard remains as it was.
Yesterday we went to see The Hunger Games, which I found pleasing. (Enormous SPOILERS follow.) It's good to see a huge box office hit that's a proper movie. By that I mean that it's not just a series of crowd-pleasing things held up in front of us, but approaches us with story and draws us in. Indeed, it's enormously interior, a rising tension generated by the way the direction stays close to facial features, often blurring backgrounds, including big CGI design work other SF films would be desperate to show off. That's just what's out there, the picture says, it's what's inside this person that's important. That's incredibly refreshing, the reverse of recent Hollywood logic. (This closeness to the lead also allows the violence to be played at a level that's appropriate for the age certificate; it's horrible, but it's glimpsed somewhere over there as she's running from it.) The movie is finished, complete, ready to show to an audience, without flapping loose ends created by conflict inside the production. It's incredible that that's become a great compliment. Okay, the story is a teenage story, where the world parents made is so unfair. It asks us to loftily condemn the spectacle of violence while really enjoying it. ('This terrible dystopia forces me to kill bullies in really satisfying ways, while neatly never encountering an actual ethical dilemma.') But so what? Big hit movies are about indulging us like that. I was a little sighing about how the only way the politics connect with anything approaching a critique of the modern world is that there are still, and always have been, bread and circuses. But I quite liked that the tyranny is so complete that we come to like characters who help our heroes but still do not for a minute rebel against the way things are. When winning the Games is the best you can hope for, then winning the Games is heroism. (I know the sequels will change all that, but this is what's in front of me now.) Jennifer Lawrence is an excellent lead, and the whole cast felt well chosen and directed. The movie as a whole gives the impression that Katniss and Peeta might have really become a couple during the Games, while the book (I gather) is firmly on the side of that all being for the cameras. (And is it a sign of the times that Spartacus now needs media coaching?) That struck me as having your cake and eating it. But all in all, I was very impressed, and I hope this leads to more female leads in action movies, more of an interior approach to the fantastic (how many of the audience will not regard this as SF because they weren't asked to boggle at mindless spectacle?) and more proper movies.
There's a new episode of The SF Squeecast out, entitled 'The Linguistic Divide of Pants', and as mentioned in last week's blog, our guest is Saladin Ahmed, who's talking about the Fighting Fantasy Gamebooks, while I rave about Anno Dracula.
James Bacon sent me this picture of him with six feet of comics...
Being the collected donations of myself and Dave Finn of Incognito Comics towards this year's Worldcon teen lounge. James is, as always, doing an amazing job there.
Videos of me being interviewed at the London Super Comic Con keep appearing, this one courtesy of Elisar at Talking Comics...
And speaking of comics, I got the chance to read an advance copy of the first issue of China Mieville's Dial H for Hero, and as you see, I really loved it.
We've once again got two interviews with fans coming to their first Eastercon (which is now officially a sell out, with no more tickets available on the day), but on the same theme, I'd like to direct you to Emma Newman's blog, where she talks about the nervousness inherent in appearing at the convention, and how one's life experiences influence that. It struck a nerve with me, and I'm sure will with many of you.
Okay, so first up, take it away Grant...
What's your name?
Grant Watson.
Why did you decide to go to Olympus?
I decided to go for a bunch of reasons. First and foremost, I have never attended a science fiction convention outside of Australia, where I was born and where I still live. Secondly, there was a fan fund. Fan funds are a scheme in which the science fiction fan community band together and pay for fans to travel to conventions in other countries. There's TAFF (Trans-Atlantic Fan Fund), which sends fans back and forth between the UK and USA, DUFF (Down Under Fan Fund), which sends fans back and forth between the USA and Australia, and even NAFF (National Australian Fan Fund), which sends fans back and forth from the different states of Australia. I ran to be the 2012 delegate for GUFF (Going Under Fan Fund), and in a fiercely fought race to be the lucky Australian fan to go to Eastercon I came... second.
The winner this year is the delightfully delightful Kylie Ding, who will also be at Eastercon representing all things Aussie, and anyone going should absolutely hunt her down and say hi during the weekend.
Since I had by this stage set my heart on going to my first international convention, and since I'd also conveniently promised my wife a holiday in the UK before and after the event, I got my finances together and decided to attend Eastercon independently.
What had you heard about previous Eastercons?
Most of what I've heard about Eastercons has been from previous GUFF delegates travelling from the UK to Australia. People like Claire Brialey, Mark Plummer, Ang Rosin and James Shields.
What do you expect to be different from cons in your own fandom?
I'm honestly not certain. The vast majority of my time in fandom has been in the city of Perth, where we've had an annual science fiction convention - Swancon - since 1976. Perth fandom has what seems to be a very distinct style; it's very 'blended', if you like, so fans of SF literature, TV shows, anime, gaming and comics have rubbed shoulders with each other without any sense of rivalry or intolerance. I'm now living in Melbourne, where fandom seems a lot more compartmentalised to me: there is a big gap here between 'media fans' and 'lit fans' that I'm really not used to.
What are you most looking forward to?
It will read like a cliche, but I'm genuinely looking forward to meeting new people. I want to get a sense of what British fandom is like, and possibly get some ideas for how conventions are run in the UK that I can take back to Australia.
In the interests of encouraging people to say hi to me over the weekend, I can say that my core fannish interests include Doctor Who, Star Trek, Hong Kong and Asian cinema, the works of Jim Henson, DC Comics - particularly Batman, William Shakespeare and Elizabethan/Jacobean theatre, French comic creators Moebius (RIP) and Lewis Trondheim, The West Wing, old 1960s ITC adventure shows and the works of the Walt Disney Company. I have previously worked as a video store clerk, cinema manager, university lecturer and hair model, and currently work as a researcher in international education for a major Australian university. I am also in my spare time an award-winning playwright. So if any of that intersects with anyone else's interests, come and have a chat: I'll be the awkward, nervous-looking one with really short hair.
How do you think SF fans will interact with fans from your subculture? What sort of panels about your own subculture's stuff are you expecting?
Surely everyone loves a gregarious Australian? If I had to pick a single primary fandom I'd always choose Doctor Who, but my interests incorporate a lot of other areas as well.
To be honest I will be very disappointed if the convention doesn't have at least one really solid, enjoyable panel about Doctor Who. After all, you're the United Kingdom: you're the home of the world's single-greatest work of science fiction television. It would be ridiculous not to celebrate that at every opportunity.
How do you see mainstream SF fandom, from the outside?
My only real exposure to science fiction fandom outside of Australia was the 2010 Melbourne Worldcon, which was largely populated by Americans. There are whole aspects of that scene I simply don't get: the weird obsession with collecting ribbons, the masses of people wanting to 'filk', the immense amount of focus and devotion placed on Masquerade costumes, etc. More than anything international SF fandom seems rather conservative to me: things have to be done the same way every time, new ideas and new media isn't immediately embraced, and there does seem to be a slight stink of prejudice against genre fiction that wasn't published as a book.
Do you think there's a chance you might ever move your primary fandom to being an SF fan?
That depends on your definition of 'SF fan'. Certainly I can't see myself abandoning film, TV and comics to focus more on literary fandom. I read plenty of books, have numerous favourite SF authors, but don't really put the dedication into that side of SF that I do into the likes of Doctor Who or DC Comics. That said, you will have to prise my first edition copy of The Day of the Triffids from my cold, dead fingers.
Grant can be found on Twitter as @angriest, online at his blog, and in podcast form with The Bad Film Diaries with Sonia Marcon and Panel2Panel with Kitty Byrne.
Next up is my old friend Sarah...
What's your name?
Sarah Groenewegen.
Why did you decide to go to Olympus?
Various people I know or would like to meet were talking about it on Twitter. It's been ages since I've been to a convention and Easter this year was relatively free of appointments. So, timing. Again via Twitter I heard about Eastercon last year and it seemed to be lot of fun from what the attendees were tweeting.
What had you heard about previous Eastercons?
Last year's sounded like it was a lot of fun, judging from tweets I saw. There seemed to be a lot of positive buzz. But, I haven't heard that much in terms of specifics.
What do you expect to be different from cons in your own fandom?
Less actors, more writers - which is being flippant, I know. My main fandom is Doctor Who. It's where I've been most active for the last few decades, on and off, although I've always had interests in other fandoms, including mainstream SF. I was involved in running some of the big Australian Doctor Who fan conventions - Whovention - during the 1990s. While I feel incredibly lucky to have met some of the actors involved in Doctor Who, that side of it has never really interested me. Even when I wasn't involved in running a Doctor Who con, I tended to not go to the panels of those conventions I attended. Talking to people was always much more of an attraction, and just because of the nature of Doctor Who fan cons in Australia that meant being able to talk properly to some of the actors who visited. The most interesting to me were those who didn't just talk about acting or Doctor Who - which was the majority, incidentally - but those who were vibrantly interested and passionate about all sorts of things life throws up. Good and bad.
I've been to some Doctor Who cons in the UK, and Gallifrey One in L.A. a few years ago now. Each time I question why I pay the attendance fee - I don't go to many of the panels or talks. LobbyCon was my home in L.A., and you'll find me in the hotel bar at others. I do pay up because the job the organisers do at the cons I've gone to are amazing, and I have an idea about the costs involved. Ultimately, if there was no con, I wouldn't be having such a good time with mates - old and new - in the peripheral areas.
I suspect I'll still enjoy the peripheral areas as much as I do for Doctor Who cons, but I see from the Olympus schedule there are panels I think I'll actually find interesting in and of themselves.
What are you most looking forward to?
Meeting people: old friends and new ones. That is the key for me.
How do you think SF fans will interact with fans from your subculture? What sort of panels about your own subculture's stuff are you expecting?
I guess my subculture is Doctor Who fandom - that's where I've spent most of my fannish time over the last 20 or so years. But, as I've said above, I don't go to Doctor Who cons for the panels, and while the panel topics about Doctor Who at Olympus seem quite interesting, I'm unlikely to go to many if any.
Forgive me while I delve a bit into my past.
I grew up in Sydney, Australia, during the 1970s and 1980s. I was most active as an SF fan during the 1980s and 1990s. My parents hate SF, but tolerated me and my brother watching Doctor Who and Blake's 7. My dad was a university lecturer at Sydney University, and some of his students and colleagues also liked Doctor Who and it was through them my brother and I attended the very first Doctor Who fan event ever held in Sydney, and then most of the subsequent ones. It was through going to them, and of being at just the right age, we became friends with other Doctor Who fans who were also fans of other things - Blake's 7, Hitch-hikers' Guide, and mainstream SF. You might spot I didn't mention Star Trek there. While a lot of my new friends were watchers of that show, and probably fans by any definition, they weren't really involved in Star Trek fandom in Australia. In fact, there was a bit of a nonsensical battle going on through the pages of various Aussie fanzines and newsletters at the time.
Generally, you could divide Aussie SF fandom into what was called 'Literature Fans', 'Media Fans', Star Trek fans, and then Doctor Who fans. My friends were mostly Doctor Who and 'Media' fans. In the very early 1980s my brother, best friend and I ran a Doctor Who and Blake's 7 fanzine for a few years. It was through that I made many friends in various SF fandoms. I read quite a bit of SF - Isaac Asimov, Michael Moorcock, Ursula LeGuin, Anne McCaffrey, Douglas Adams - but pretty much watched Doctor Who and then V. It was through V fandom I became friends with the people who worked at Sydney's specialist SF bookshop Galaxy. We swapped fanzines and I read SF more widely. I started to go to various conventions - not just Doctor Who ones - but sadly never made it to a WorldCon.
In summary, I think people will mingle. I certainly plan on mingling with others who are there.
How do you see mainstream SF fandom, from the outside?
Bit more varied in what topics are discussed. But, since I know quite a few mainstream SF fans also like Doctor Who (and vice versa) I'm curious about what real differences there are. I'm excited by quite a bit of the newer SF - writers like Lauren Beukes, for example.
Do you think there's a chance you might ever move your primary fandom to being an SF fan?
It's possible, but I know I'll never leave Doctor Who fandom behind :-)
Sarah's blog can be found here. Thanks very much, Sarah.
My favourite music this week is something new. I recently bought Theo Bleckmann's Hello Earth!, the jazz vocalist's collection of Kate Bush covers, and I'm impressed. He's the only artist who I think improves on a Kate original, with his 'Love and Anger'. Here's his take on 'Running Up That Hill'...
This time next week I'll be seeing some of you at Olympus 2012 (and there'll be no blog, though I will be guesting on Pornokitsch and will link to it here on the day). Please come over and say hello. I'm there as a Guest of Honour to be available. Especially if this is your first SF convention, or you've arrived from a different fandom. I'm happy to help you navigate. Until then, Cheerio!












