A whole bunch of us in the pre-Hugo Awards party, all with nominee pins on our lapels: Lou Anders, up for Best Editor for the second time; John Picacio, the great artist and his charming wife; David Louis Edelman, up for the Campbell. Ian McDonald, wonderfully, for Brasyl, Best Novel, my friends, the big one. (Lou has thrown an enormous Brazilian party in his honour the previous night, where we all discovered that the Brazilian national drink is rum with a bit of rum in it and a slice of lime, and everyone who is anyone came along.) I’m in my suit and Converse All Stars, and Chris Roberson and Jay Lake have extraordinary shoes on also. Chris, Lou and John are the supporting poles of Worldcon bar life, and the best thing about going there is being part of their travelling circus.
(All photos courtesy of Lou, there with Ian in the second photo.) It’s not our year for wins, though. Picacio comes closest, second, with a whole career in front of him to make up that distance. Anyone who’s gone to one of his slide shows knows he deserves to make it, and will be a most fitting winner when he does. Lou, also, has time on his side. David gets third, against some tough competition.
It’s a huge and tremendous thing, being part of an awards ceremony when you care passionately about the result. On the day of the Hugos, I wandered into the enormous empty auditorium, rehearsed with the organisers as every nominee is asked to, came out again having stood on that stage, wandered some more. People talk about the ‘greying of fandom’ and try to write off Worldcon, but this is where the frigging saints have trod, and as long as that feeling is still with us to oppress new Hugo nominees in huge convention buildings, then this event will always be with us. Doselle Young grabbed me and took me for a beer, because I think I must have looked like a lost puppy.
A couple of days before, Melinda Snodgrass had taken us and Carrie Vaughn and the organisers of the Aussie Worldcon in 2010 out to a Moroccan restaurant where we lounged on cushions and plucked sweetmeats with our fingers and glanced at belly dancers over our shoulders. The Aussies admitted they’d voted for Moffat, and I was absurdly hurt, could hardly look at them. But then we all started talking about cricket, so that was okay. ‘You’re meant to feel as strongly as that,’ said Melinda, kindly, later. But the intensity of it rather surprised and shamed me.
So on the night, we’re all in a line in the nominee seats, in that huge and now full auditorium, and we sit and wait, as nominees should, through the Big Heart awards for long and friendly service in fandom that come before the Hugos, and I find the whole atmosphere tremendously... comforting. It says ‘you’ll be back’, like I just said to Lou. I’ve discovered that’s the award I most want: the Big Heart. When I’m ninety and have an enormous beard. I want to still be here then, having lived for an uninterrupted series of Worldcons. When the presenter says ‘Blink’ I’m able, to my great relief, to cheer, and not to be a selfish fool in the face of my old friend’s success. He sent a very funny note to be read out, and we shared some gracious text messages in the early hours when I stumbled in after all the parties. If he wins again next year, and you know he will, Doctor Who will have gone from ‘the kind of thing that will never win a Hugo award’ as Starlog once put it, to the show that has jointly won the most, tying with both The Twilight Zone and all kinds of Star Trek put together. Then we have to get one more.
From later on that night, I only have vague images of Mary Robinette Kowal, new light of the SFWA and Campbell winner, in the Campbell tiara, drifting past in a golden dress like the bringer of new order at the end of a Shakespeare play. Greying of fandom my arse. Maybe this is the start of something. How about we ask Stephenie Meyer to be a Guest of Honour as soon as possible? And, as Lou urgently tells me when we go out to dinner, let high school kids in for free?
I met a number of new and lovely people in the company of the Lou/Chris/John trifecta this year: Bill Willingham, the writer of Fables, my favourite comic, who wears his glory lightly and was a little freaked out, I think, by my gushing; John Scalzi, the blockbuster face of hard SF, and a feisty scrapper of a fellow panellist, missed Best Novel by nine votes, got Best Fan Writer off Langford, then said vote for someone else next year, excellent company my friends; Shanna Swendson, who’s as charming and Carrie Bradshaw as the heroines of her books. And many more.
I was reading David’s sequel to Infoquake, that is Multireal, during the convention, and as always it spoke to me about my life like no other author does. As much as I loved Infoquake, Multireal is better. It’s The West Wing, in the world of big business, in the future, all last second deals and human emotion finding desperate chances and tense negotiations, but this time with added sex and violence. I was almost disappointed to find some, in that last time David had me on the edge of my seat with only one burst of gunfire and the glimpse of an ankle, and I was hoping to see that feat again, but this book soars mightily, and presents me with terms I find myself mentally using in everyday life (the fiefcorp of Pyr Books, the memecorp of the BBC), and situations redolent of it. The bar and the panels and the awards map onto the fingernail biting world of freelancing in the future. It’s not, as I thought after the first book, a work of Mundane SF, because the (albeit unreliable and hardly magic) teleportation just about rules it out. But I still believe that this world, almost uniquely in modern SF, isn’t just a commentary on the modern scene, but might also come to pass. David has thought about who empties the bins. And his singularity came and went and those bins still needed to be emptied. Most wonderfully, two big set piece speeches in the middle of the book, which sum up its themes of governmentalism vs. libertarian capital, dissolve into the most brilliant shit-flinging gunfight and escape, and one can hear David laughing, shouting ‘yeah, you can have both!’ The mass market paperback of Infoquake was in the bloody airport bookstore on the way out. I’m saying not just Campbell next year but come on, let’s say it out loud, Best Novel.
I did some panels. I was lacklustre on ‘best villains in SF’, then perked up a lot in the company of Jeff Fennel and Graham Sleight on ‘Does SF matter?’ where I was proud of my contribution towards an interrogation of why the genre feels so self-conscious about itself as both a literary form and community and an instrument of social change (every now and then, possibly, discuss). That’s the other great thing about Worldcons, that the panels matter (every now and then, possibly, discuss) and can be, at their best, symposia. (Witness David Brin’s scathing attack on the SETI community, which I felt privileged to be in the audience for.) I was pleased at what we got to with ‘Shakespeare’s themes in SF’, and here, as promised, I summarise my opening rant from that panel, where I tried to sum up the ground we were going to cover:
‘”O God, I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space–were it not that I have bad dreams”, as Hamlet says, which is Phil Dick in a nutshell. Hamlet is of course the first confused AI as he tries to discover what being a person means. Forbidden Planet is the obvious start text, Shakespeare as SF 101, but there’s a lot more in the way of connection than that. The rude mechanicals of Star Wars. The forest in A Midsummer Night’s Dream as the first parallel universe, where the rules of society are different to those at court. (Sure, there’s the idea of Avalon and such before that, but those are afterlifes or physically connected to the world, and this uses the same actors in different roles, originally, probably, to suggest the parallel world idea.) There’s Foundation (the books not the magazine, though I don’t know) modelling itself on the history plays. There’s Dune grabbing loads of tropes from Shakespeare’s villains. There’s the bastard figure as the mutant, hated and feared by a world he never made. And there’s the restoration of order, as someone in a silver spacesuit, or the singularity, or Mary Robinette Kowal, walks down a ladder to tell everyone the play’s over now and everything’s going to be all right.’
Phew. Well, it was probably better when yelled across a crowded room. Then I was useless again in a panel about whether or not social forces or great people are the levers of historical alternatives (both sides being too politicised, I think). I did all my thinking in the first ten minutes and then floundered. (Does anyone else treat panels as sporting contests? I sometimes think I’ll see a row of judges at the back holding up scorecards.) And finally there was a glowing, incredibly friendly, packed to the ceiling (Stephen Baxter putting his hand up!) Doctor Who panel, which basically was just loads of people talking very fast about how great the show is. (And having been given the opportunity to be ‘Mr. SF’ for all the previous panels, it was kind of relaxing to be a Who fanboy again. ‘Second is right after first’ I said on being introduced, and got a cheer. Thanks, all. I also went on one of Stu Segal’s ‘strolls with the stars’, where me and John and Lou and about fifty people took a mile walk around the (really rather ugly and deprived) streets of Denver. Lou and John laugh at me for working the crowd, like I’m a Democrat from a week after our convention, shaking every hand.
I’m sure I’ve missed out on some of the greatness. The company, as always. The way the format of the weekend shapes the company, gives everyone targets, trauma, dreams, things to talk about. The history. The fact that to make a panel rock in this company you have to do some heavy lifting. The showbiz combo of great respect and great flippancy. Here are some places to find the pictures that my hands were too shaky to take. Strolling:
http://community.livejournal.com/denvention3/125985.html
Hugo party photos:
http://www.johnpicacio.com/2008/08/worldcon-2008-photos.html
Lou’s report:
http://louanders.blogspot.com/2008/08/worldcon-2008-denvention3-report.html
And more pictures:
http://louanders.blogspot.com/2008/08/worldcon-2008-few-more-pics.html
And then we were off into Colorado, and whitewater rafting, horse riding, and in Caroline’s case, rock climbing. I wasn’t rock climbing because I was walking back and forth on a bandstand in Aspen before my hotel would let me check in, on my mobile to my latest fiefcorp master, saying: ‘I understand that you might not want to see a CCTV camera, because that would mean constructing a roof, but if we see our heroine from the CCTV’s camera’s point of view, then that provides the general sense of paranoia you’re after. If we just see her from an unseen POV, on two occasions, then the audience will expect, without knowing they expect, to discover, on a third occasion, who’s watching her. Okay, so let’s make that end scene a reveal of someone watching her. Who’s the most harmless character? Okay, them!’ And I look around to see that a small boy has been watching me, entranced by the gibberish I’m talking. Or perhaps just appalled that I’m working on holiday.
We saw dinosaur footprints, experienced enormous weather (too much rain out here too, Forty Signs of Rain ahoy), walked sand dunes and watched the Olympics from a series of bars. And came home thoroughly rested. I love fandom, I love Worldcon, and I’ll be back. For that Big Heart award. Look out for the beard in 2058.
I’m sorry I won’t be making it to Timegate in Atlanta, as advertised, but I will be in Calgary to support Chris and Alison, John and Kim in their World Fantasy Award nominations, and to be with Rob Shearman, twice nominated for his short stories, first time for him, and rather amazed about it:
http://www.worldfantasy.org/awards/
Final thing for the Who fans, courtesy of Tara O’Shea, this extraordinary fan video, which both shows off the editing skills and tech now in place in the field, and actually offers narrative and commentary on the current show, in a brilliant and shocking way (one of many in an increasingly intelligent artform, so I’m told, it was all jog and shuttle back in my day):
http://www.imeem.com/flummery/video/qrsaWFB9/flummery_dw_handlebars_tv_video/
Until next time, Cheerio.

21 comments:
Sounds to me like you had a great time. I've never done a world con - was tempted to a few years back when they held in in Scotland but just didn't have th funds to do it:(
I generally barely manage one or two standard SF Television events a year.
The biggest have ever been to is SF Ball which is a charity event that raises money for Christys McMillion Centre in Bournemouth - but sadly that event is mostly about the folks in front of the camera which I enjoy - but being the type of person that has a mind that wants to know everything down to the smallest trivia. I like to know what the writers have to say and think as well as the directors.
Perhaps one day I will get to do a world con. Hey maybe if I succeed with my current comic book idea - I may be a guest there say in about another 10 or 100 years lol.
As to the next Doctor Who Hugo - I think that maybe yours. I mean Mr Moffat will be producing and writing much more for Doctor Who which may well improve his chances of winning another one - but I think fans will get spoilt with Moffat scripts in the 2010 season of Doctor Who - and will vote for someone else because there work seems fresher.
To be honest I would have found it incredibly difficult to choose between Blink and Human Nature. I really loved both stories. I liked the idea of Blink with its killer statues - but also enjoyed the human drama and how difficult life was for Martha in Human nature acting as the Doctors Caretaker and trying to keep him safe from danger.
What I really liked though was the ending few moments of Family Blood where the narrator explains that the Doctor was trying to be kind to his adversary by going underground the way he did. It brought forth that darker part of the Doctor that is always lurking.
I remember seeing the first William Hartnel Adventure back in the 1980s when the BBC repeated episodes of the other Doctor Whos in order to celebrate the 20th anniversary and I was a little shocked at the scene where the Doctor gets a rock and is about to kill the cave man - yet Ian and Barbera stop him.
Anyway sorry to be rambling. Sort of writing this and enjoying the closing ceremony of the olympics. Captain Britain to light the olympic flame in London 2012 I say.
I remember being terribly scared at my first panel in San Diego. It was part of the CAC (the academic conference held at the Con) and I was on a panel talking about continuity with Paul Levitz (the head of DC) and Peter Sanderson (who is like a walking encyclopedia of facts). I believe I read my paper (which was the proto-Vertigo books before there was a Vertigo and their use of DCU characters) and then tried to sit quietly, usually only talking when called upon directly. It was about the same the next year when I moderated a panel for the first time.
On a totally unrelated matter, I was re-reading the WISDOM trade the other day and couldn't remember what had happened to the other Skrull Beatles after the fight with the Martians.
Thanks for that fanvid link - I'm in awe of people who have the skills to create them, and that one's a particularly awesome one.
What a wonderful report! Looking forward to seeing you in Calgary.
--Jen Heddle
Beautiful post, Paul. Thank you for taking the time to share your experiences with us.
BTW, thanks to your tip on Comic Book Locator, I found Captain Britain. Seems to be selling well here in the wilds of Northern Virginia. Looking forward to more.
Thanks, all. Jen, I look forward to seeing you in Calgary too. The Skrull Beatles wandered off at the end of Wisdom with the aim of becoming the Skrull Monkees. Unfortunately, that never came to pass.
Wonderful Worldcon report. Mind if I link to it from the Denvention Web site?
Laurie Mann
Denvention Webmaster &
Hugo Ceremony Manager
Paul,
Changing the subject reall quick.
I noticed other day while at my sisters place that ITV will be showing a drama which has some weird type of connection with the works of Jane Austen.
Just wondered if you happen to know any buzz about it. You know? Do you think it will be worth a look?
Yes, Laurie, of course, thanks very much! And no, I've no idea what that is. Cheers.
I've set up a page of Denvention 3 News and Post-con Reports and have included a link to your report.
Sounds like you had a great time. I shall be suitably jealous.
whether or not social forces or great people are the levers of historical alternatives
I've thought for a while that the structure of history (that's a very Who-fan way to think of it, isn't it?) is really an example of chaos theory in action. Large societal forces push the system around, but it's very sensitive to small changes, so the right person in the right place at the right time can tip it over from one state to another. Both are true but neither is the whole picture (well, I'd argue quite strongly with "great" as an appropriate descriptor for all the members of the class "people who influence history", but that's a side issue).
(And OMG what did Stephen Baxter put his hand up for? Or was it so packed that he didn't even get to ask his question?)
Really enjoyed the new issue of Fantastic Four: True Story, Mr. Cornell.
What made you decide to base the main story in the Regency period of literature?
Thanks, all. Actually, Liberal, that was much the conclusion the panel came to, large scale change by social forces with individuals sometimes turning everything round. And therefore time being quite 'robust'. You step on a butterfly in prehistoric times to no great effect. I suspect that time travel is fundamentally impossible anyway, for reasons we have absolutely no idea of at the moment (what time is being one of those lovely unanswered questions of physics). And of course I let Stephen ask his question, but I can't remember what it was! Liberal: largely the matter of copyright! Plus I really enjoy Austen. We're going to be moving around in literary time a bit next issue. Glad you enjoyed it.
Hi - this may seem like an odd question and not related to your blog! Am researching my family tree and have found a charcater name in "The Shadow of the Scourge" Doctor Who: The Big Finish Audio Adventures #13 - Michael Pembroke - that I am interested in knowing mre about. Do you remember where the name came from?
Hope you can help and don't mind a mad message!
PS Have loved your recent episodes of Doctor Who!
Thanks! I'm sorry to not be much help, though, I just made that name up!
Human Nature would have got my vote, but to be fair you were very, very, very (insert many more 'very's!) unlucky to be up aganist Blink!
I agree, I think it's his best work.
I'm truly sorry that Human Nature didn't win the Hugo -- it was an effing marvelous story and I loved it. And it was nice to meet you at the Hugos (I was the economy sized redhead sitting in the row in front of you).
Thanks very much. You can confirm that I did all that cheering!
We Aussies who joined you at Mataam Fez did say that we loved FAMILY OF BLOOD, you know - you just had the bad luck to be in a very tightly contested year. We just saw your show in repeats and got to see the Doctor Who Confidential about it, which was a lot of fun.
Pleasure meeting you in Denver!
I know, I was just really strung out. Pleasure meeting you, too.
Post a Comment