I’m pleased to announce that the winners of the Facebook
Telegraph story contest will get their original artwork in a nice frame, behind glass, and you can’t say fairer than that. Hundreds of you have joined in so far. Goodness, thank you! For the address, look back down in the previous Twelve Blogs.
I knew there were things I liked about the year that I’ve missed talking about thus far, and two came to mind last night:
Stardust. I absolutely adored that. It’s a specific British strain of fantasy which makes absolute sense in terms of creating filmic worlds: we know where we are and who everyone is from the first frame. The British, as Susannah Clarke has also made clear, are so good at living with fairyland (through the traditions of panto) that we’ve actually got rather blasé about it, and tend to react with surprise to the notion of specific ‘fairy story’ texts. I blogged about it at the time, so I won’t go on, but I thought it was big, charming, full of story, and tremendously easy to digest. Simply ideal.
Batman by Grant Morrison. Another bit of effortless icon use. Morrison’s Batman is Bruce Wayne, his Bruce Wayne is Batman. He’s a sane chap on a mission, who’s got room for humour, family and love in his life, and has been known to smile. The widescreen Kubert art helps, but it’s Morrison’s big cinematic gestures and his own sense of mission, in his care for the character, that really impress. And I particularly loved the issue that wasn’t a comic, but an illustrated text story, that showed he understands the Joker too. That’s the sort of one off issue that fans will pull out to show people in twenty years time.
Just got back from lunch with (author) Juliet McKenna. Jules lives in the next town, so we meet up for lunch every Christmas. Another one of those lovely yearly signposts. She’s signed with Solaris now, and is having a fabulous time with them, enjoying as I do, Marc Gascoigne and George Mann’s professionalism, business sense and inclination to buy dinner.
And it’s my first proper day off. Nothing to do. Goodness. Apart from this, obviously.
So today it’s my blog about Facebook. This social networking tool has become my central interaction with the internet, since I found MySpace to be unsatisfactory in terms of everything from graphics to privacy (I think it’s becoming a thing musicians do, and might do well to cater only to them, because the musos I know still live there). I think it, or something like it, will actually become ‘the internet’ shortly, in that a warm, friendly desktop environment with everything handy seems to me to be the ideal interface with the web. I suspect that a certain amount of de-branding will occur, as different social networks give way to a catch-all generic system. But we’re a way off from that.
When I put together my Christmas list, I expected to find loads of friend’s addresses on Facebook, but I found hardly any. Now, this seems to me to defeat the purpose. My own point of view is, I’m completely invisible on Facebook, I can’t be befriended, and I will only befriend people I know quite well in the real world (I’m only Facebook friends with two people that I haven’t met in the flesh). My Friends are thus the people who I don’t mind knowing my contact details. Now, I think most of my friends use Facebook in the same way. That is, they don’t leave themselves open to random befriendings from strangers. So why the hesitation about details?
I think some of it is about getting used to the difference between this new form of net use, and the old form, where one had to take more care. Indeed, navigating this line is where most of the current Facebook horror stories come from, all of which come down to: don’t be a complete idiot. That sort of stuff only happens to people who let anyone befriend them and then put their credit card details online. If you’re not that sort of plank, and only dealing with actual friends, then sharing a degree more personal info is, I think, useful.
What can Facebook do for you? Nothing. You see that phone sitting there on your desk, what can it do for you? Nothing. You can do lots of stuff using it. So can your friends. But it, in itself, is not going to rouse itself to housework. My point is: Facebook is a medium for you to do interesting stuff and experience interesting stuff others do. It doesn’t provide passive entertainment.
For instance, you know those groups people start: We Love Wispa Bars! Everyone arrives, and says how they love Wispa Bars too. The Wall gets full of that. But whoever started the group thinks that’s basically the subject covered then, and buggers off to start Aren’t Chocolate Bars Getting Smaller These Days? Everyone else sits there looking at each other, wondering when the fun’s going to start. Whatever said fun could possibly be. Now, I don’t blame them so much. I blame whoever started a group with the idea that they themselves wouldn’t have to provide any content. Generally, I give groups I join a couple of weeks, and see if content is provided by the originators, and then hop it if it isn’t.
There are a number of great Facebook groups that do provide such content.
SFX and
Doctor Who Magazine both have groups where staffers interact with the readers, and material for future issues (like interview questions) is harvested. Big Finish Audio gets it right too. In Support of the Writers Guild of America Strike is basically the complete resource of everything you need to know. (Facebook is great for group action, but some causes are served better than others. A campaign to take the ‘is’ out of the status update line was successful, because Facebook were watching it. Campaigning for anyone to win
Strictly Come Dancing strikes one as being embarrassingly futile. And some campaigns, those that seek to get a certain number of people to sign up, should really be called Make Me Feel Validated By Joining My Group In Huge Numbers.) Make Mine Marvel UK and the70s TV Weirdness club are right on the cusp: their creators added loads of good material initially (and Kim Newman has created whole essays for the latter), but now the crowd assembled really should repay that with some more work of their own. Some groups work fine just by reader contribution: Signs That Fascinate And Intrigue wouldn’t work so well in any other medium. But as for When I Was Your Age Pluto Was A Planet… yes. And?
It’s the Applications that Facebook lives and dies on. The killer app is of course Scrabulous, the first game that works better on Facebook than it does in real life. I have games going with fellow comics writers, SF writers, and I run a league for people in my town. (My town actually runs on Facebook, with gigs and nights down the bar registered as Events, so that they’ll show up on our Calendars, and thus advertise themselves to our fellows.) We still await the second great game app. The Quiz function of Movies, which has allowed various fan mates to set truly diabolical quizzes, nearly gets there, but it’s not what Movies was quite designed for. Various people have developed large scale fantasy games: (author) Garth Nix just invited me to have a go at his,
Imperial Galaxy, but I haven’t tried it yet so can’t comment (though Garth has a reputation that convinces me I should).
Some applications took the place of what should have been Facebook functionality. Circle of Friends enabled one to organise your Friends into groups and then message them as groups, something very useful when you don’t want to, for instance, invite mates in L.A. to drinks in Oxfordshire tonight. Facebook have responded to that by altering their Friends mechanisms to allow something similar (though it’s still pretty damn buggy).
I like an Application that either provides me with fun (Political Compass, IQ Test), or serves a purpose (I Like, which I use to put up a new music video every Saturday). I don’t like Applications that insist (rather than ask and provide a Skip button) that you tell all your friends about them. That’s not viral advertising, that herpes advertising. (But I’ve only encountered a couple like that.) And I don’t like Applications that send you notifications as though you’ve signed up to them, when people are just asking you to. No, Sheila from down the bar hasn’t sent me a message, she’s sent me an invitation to join your Application. There really also should be certain kinds of Application that distribute passively without having to join them. Christmas Cards, for example, shouldn’t have needed an opt in to see cards other people have sent you. But that may be technically impossible.
One thing people feel anxious about on Facebook is turning down such requests to join an Application. Particularly for those Pirate, Vampire and Zombie games, the invitations to join which are phrased quite aggressively. ‘Frank Darcy has bitten a chunk out of you. Do you want to bite him back?’ Myself, I merrily hit Ignore Ignore Ignore and think no more of it. But some people worry that the person who sent the original invite will get a message saying ‘Frank, Paul has Ignored you. Do you now want to bite a chunk out of him in real life?’ I’ve never encountered an application that keeps score like that, and I think most such group invites are sent not to a specifically selected group of Friends, but to everyone in the address book, and that those who send them aren’t paying much attention to who declines. That’s also why, I think, people who put signs on their Profiles saying ‘I Ignore Zombies’ are still irritated by them. Nobody who’s doing that has seen the sign. There’s a group that’s been started up asking Facebook to be able to turn down such Applications with one negative response, rather than having to keep doing so, and I think that’s probably a good idea.
One thing I don’t like, though, is Facebook naysayers on Facebook. That is, people who join groups called No I Don’t Want To Be A Zombie, **** Off! And especially those who endlessly update with ‘can’t see the point of Facebook’ and ‘is still bemused at why she’s here’. I gather someone must be standing beside these people at their computers, forcing them at gunpoint to participate against their will. I don’t know about you, but if I’m at a party, and I’m asked to join a game of Twister, and I don’t fancy it, I don’t stand on a chair, announce I’m starting the anti-Twister league and call for members.
Some Applications work for other folk, but not for me. I just have a Wall, not a Fun Wall or a Super Wall, because I know exactly the sort of things Guy and Simon and Khal would put on my Fun Wall (indeed, I’ve taken on the Application for five minutes, and had a look, and yes they did) and not in front of everyone else, thank you. I’m excited to use Books to plonk one-click Amazon links to my own titles near the top of my Profile, and then Posted Items to feature Caroline’s two bands.
The central point of my life on Facebook is to gather together people I really know, entertain them, and be entertained by them. The morning selection of everything people have been doing, of tiny quotes about their lives, of heartbreaking or heartwarming changes in status (‘… is no longer in a relationship’, updated ‘interested in’…) is worth the whole system in itself. I’ve gotten on good terms with (nearly) all my exes as a result of contacting them through Facebook. My Social Timeline has (nearly) sorted out my confused and impossible past into something resembling a narrative. And the way an old photo of you can pop up from someone else, with your image tagged in it, and thus call you to see it, is again a new glory of the internet age. There’s your past, popping up again all around you. Wow.
In the New Year, I’m hoping Facebook will continue to listen and innovate, and that Applications, and the advertising they bring, will continue to be the revenue generator of choice. I don’t think it’s a waste of my time, I think it’s using my time well, because it’s all used on my friends. And as I said, I think in a few years time it’ll just be what we mean when we say ‘the internet’.
There we go! I’m going to talk about
Doctor Who towards the end of the Twelve Blogs, I promise, both about my story and the Christmas special.
Today’s links are about radio this very evening:
At 5pm, on Resonance FM (104.4FM (London) / streamed at
www.resonancefm.com / podcast at
www.panelborders.com) Alex Fitch and Duncan Nott are looking at the depiction of beloved children's characters in comics, and are talking with a mate of mine,
Fables artist Mark Buckingham, and then with the
Transformers chaps, Geoff Senior and Simon Furman.
Then, at 6.30pm, Penny Broadhurst, pop star of this parish, is on Radio Four,
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=7858817270 as part of
28 Acts In 28 Minutes.
Do give them a listen, and until I see you tomorrow, Cheerio!